Archive for vehicles

Mar
26

ZERO EMISSION HYBRID RAILCAR

Posted by: cliveh | Comments (0)

Ultra Light Rail – the Fast Track to Fuel Cells

Introducing Fuel Cells to the Commercial Public Transport Market

Fuel cells are now recognised as a key technology in the process of weaning the modern world from its dependence on fossil fuels and leading it into a new age of alternative energy. The principal obstacle still to be overcome is the high cost of fuel cells. In transport, for example, one kilowatt from a fuel cell costs around $3,000, compared with $30 per kilowatt for an internal combustion engine. Somehow a reduction of two orders of magnitude has to be achieved if fuel cells are to compete with alternatives in the commercial market for transport.

There are two complementary approaches to achieving this reduction. The first and most obvious is to increase the efficiency of the fuel cell in producing electricity from hydrogen. But producing electricity is not an end in itself. It is rather a means to enable us to achieve the end objective, which is to provide people with useful services such as heat, light and mobility. The cost of mobility can therefore be reduced just as much by increasing the energy efficiency of the system in which the fuel cell is used, as by increasing the efficiency of the fuel cell itself.

Ultra Light Rail is a transport system designed to eliminate the two orders of magnitude gap between the fuel cell and the internal combustion engine. The first step is to increase the efficiency of the vehicle system in which the fuel cell is used. This can be done in a number of ways but the most dramatic “step change” in energy efficiency can be achieved by using a vehicle running with steel wheels on steel rails. This immediately reduces the energy requirement by a factor of three, since the lower rolling resistance allows a tram to use only one third of the energy required by a similar sized bus.

Further cost reductions in the vehicle system can be achieved by introducing an on-board energy storage system in a hybrid electric drive train, similar, in principle, to that used in the Toyota Prius and other cars and even in some buses. This makes possible a lower rating for the prime on-board power source which is required only to run at its optimum level, in order to keep the energy storage system topped up. It also allows for the energy from braking to be recaptured and used, rather than dissipated in heat vented to the atmosphere. Still more efficiency can be introduced by integrating the electric motors into the wheels. The overall weight of the vehicle can be reduced by each of these innovations whilst the body itself can be manufactured from carbon fibre composite materials in a monocoque form. The whole process, using standard proven technology, creates a spiralling cost reduction, resulting from each innovative feature.

Using only some of these features, practical test work carried out by Sustraco Ltd, with support from a Carbon Trust grant, has shown that a 25 kilowatt fuel cell would be sufficient to power a light tram with similar capacity to the fuel cell buses tested in London under the EU’s CUTE programme. These buses have done an invaluable job in demonstrating to the public that fuel cells are no different to internal combustion engines in performance and safety. However the buses themselves are grossly inefficient in commercial terms, costing, as they do, some five times as much as a similar diesel bus and requiring 250 kilowatts fuel cell to operate them. The next logical step in commercialising the operation of fuel cell powered public transport vehicles must therefore be to integrate the fuel cell into an energy efficient tram.

The full report can be found by following this Link.

Popularity: 15% [?]

Carbon Pathways Analysis July 2008

Executive Summary

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 2: Carbon Pathways by Mode

Chapter 3: Carbon Pathways by Type of Journey

Chapter 4: The Impact of Mode Switch on Emissions

Chapter 5: International Comparisons

Chapter 6: The Challenge for Transport

Acknowledgements

This paper has benefited greatly from the inputs of Mark Barrett at UCL, the
Transport Research Laboratory and a peer review group which comprised of
representatives from Defra, BERR and the Office of Climate Change.

Executive Summary

1. Averting dangerous levels of climate change presents one of our biggestchallenges. It will require international action, but – if actions are taken early and are well designed – can be addressed at manageable cost. Evidence from the Stern Review1 suggests that the cost of action to ensure that the worst impacts of climate change are avoided might be around 1% of global GDP, and perhaps a little more in developed countries. This compares to a cost associated with inaction equivalent to losing at least 5% of global GDP each year, now and forever……………….

Full paper at – http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/analysis.pdf

Popularity: 9% [?]

On a Well to Wheel basis, importing gas as LNG then making it into CNG gives much lower Well to Wheel CO2 that taking the CH4 and making it into synthetic diesel. The diesel Passat gives 50% more CO2 for the same performance as the CNG Passat according to presentation from John Baldwin
MD, CNG Services Ltd.

www.cngservices.co.uk
john.baldwinaaaatttttcngservices.co.uk

Popularity: 7% [?]

Categories : Oil, Transportation
Comments (0)

 

 

13th January. Toyota announced that it plans to start selling fuel cell vehicles in 2015. They also announced they will release a plug-in hybrid later this year and an all-electric two seater in 2012. Speaking at the North American International Auto Show Masatami Takimoto, Toyota’s executive vice president of research and development, said “Toyota believes that in the long run we’ll have small electric cars for short-distance driving, plug-in hybrids that run on biofuels for regular use, and on a bigger scale hydrogen fuel-cell cars will survive in the end game.”

 

Thanks to Jon Moore for providing this piece.

 

Popularity: 7% [?]

Wallis’ excellent paper attempts to show why cars powered by hydrogen fuel cells are not the immediate future of private motoring, and why batteries have an important and immediate part to play.

Note: (‘Nazi sharks etc.’ refers to a no doubt bad taste joke, made by James May during the recent BBC TV Top Gear show, the popular lads programme about cars: Jeremy Clarkson, of Top Gear has recently reviewed the Tesla electric / battery powered car in The Times On-Line)

The paper briefly examines the existing and possible future energy sources for vehicles, and tries to disentangle some of the commonly used definitions for proposed vehicles, and then examines the sustainable alternatives – and compatibilities – for road transport.

There are some very good examples of what current vehicles can do, and some calculations of the likely contribution need from nuclear or wind energy.

The paper concludes that electric mode vehicle use can shift transport in the UK away from oil towards sustainable low carbon solutions. It can be done quickly and inexpensively, with the technology we have right now and over a timescale of ten to twenty years. Moreover it does so by switching demand to a power source which does not sacrifice the comfort and real-world performance that we have come to expect from fossil fuel cars.

In the United States things look even better. Their proportional savings remain about the same as UK but they save upwards of 120 million tonnes of oil per year.

Looking up to and beyond the next couple of decades Wallis concludes that hydrogen is going to be a big part of the automotive future, one way or another – just not the immediate future, and none of us can afford to wait till then.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Popularity: 11% [?]