Archive for Storage

Summary – this article offers compelling reasons for using a flywheel in combination with a diesel generator for UPS rather than a battery UPS.  Batteries are the weakest point of any generator – their maintenance is easily overlooked, and the flywheel eliminates the need for them, by storing enough energy to start the generator, and to provide no break power whilst the generator is starting.   If battery UPS is used, this has a limited run time – maybe 20 – 30 minutes, after which time, everything is down unless a generator is installed, so why not put in the flywheel and diesel gen set in the first place, since this will give unlimited UPS.

This article is written by and features Active Power who manufacture these systems.

As compared to other energy storage technologies (i.e., flow battery, compressed air, hydrogen, lithium ion battery, etc.), flywheel technology is a very mature, field proven technology. It’s worth noting  Active Power was the first to commercialize a mechanical flywheel energy storage system and soon after patented the integration of UPS electronics with flywheel energy storage. Flywheel operation is very well understood and Active Power alone has more than 2,100 flywheels deployed in the field to date with more than 55 million hours of runtime. Flywheels present the most power dense energy storage technology when used as a bridging device between an outage and on to a generator. Read More→

Popularity: 20% [?]

Comments (1)

The energy storage industry is assured of a successful future.  There will be setbacks in these difficult times, of course, in a sector that has many vulnerable pre-commercial technology developers.  However, storage has all the attributes of a cornerstone technology, enabling real progress in areas that are certain to be of huge significance:

  • the effective use of renewable and distributed energy resources
  • better utilization of assets within the electricity supply industry
  • secure power provision, both at end-user sites and within the ESI
  • sustainable motive power for road vehicles and other mobile applications. Read More→

Popularity: 6% [?]

Mar
26

ZERO EMISSION HYBRID RAILCAR

Posted by: cliveh | Comments (0)

Ultra Light Rail – the Fast Track to Fuel Cells

Introducing Fuel Cells to the Commercial Public Transport Market

Fuel cells are now recognised as a key technology in the process of weaning the modern world from its dependence on fossil fuels and leading it into a new age of alternative energy. The principal obstacle still to be overcome is the high cost of fuel cells. In transport, for example, one kilowatt from a fuel cell costs around $3,000, compared with $30 per kilowatt for an internal combustion engine. Somehow a reduction of two orders of magnitude has to be achieved if fuel cells are to compete with alternatives in the commercial market for transport.

There are two complementary approaches to achieving this reduction. The first and most obvious is to increase the efficiency of the fuel cell in producing electricity from hydrogen. But producing electricity is not an end in itself. It is rather a means to enable us to achieve the end objective, which is to provide people with useful services such as heat, light and mobility. The cost of mobility can therefore be reduced just as much by increasing the energy efficiency of the system in which the fuel cell is used, as by increasing the efficiency of the fuel cell itself.

Ultra Light Rail is a transport system designed to eliminate the two orders of magnitude gap between the fuel cell and the internal combustion engine. The first step is to increase the efficiency of the vehicle system in which the fuel cell is used. This can be done in a number of ways but the most dramatic “step change” in energy efficiency can be achieved by using a vehicle running with steel wheels on steel rails. This immediately reduces the energy requirement by a factor of three, since the lower rolling resistance allows a tram to use only one third of the energy required by a similar sized bus.

Further cost reductions in the vehicle system can be achieved by introducing an on-board energy storage system in a hybrid electric drive train, similar, in principle, to that used in the Toyota Prius and other cars and even in some buses. This makes possible a lower rating for the prime on-board power source which is required only to run at its optimum level, in order to keep the energy storage system topped up. It also allows for the energy from braking to be recaptured and used, rather than dissipated in heat vented to the atmosphere. Still more efficiency can be introduced by integrating the electric motors into the wheels. The overall weight of the vehicle can be reduced by each of these innovations whilst the body itself can be manufactured from carbon fibre composite materials in a monocoque form. The whole process, using standard proven technology, creates a spiralling cost reduction, resulting from each innovative feature.

Using only some of these features, practical test work carried out by Sustraco Ltd, with support from a Carbon Trust grant, has shown that a 25 kilowatt fuel cell would be sufficient to power a light tram with similar capacity to the fuel cell buses tested in London under the EU’s CUTE programme. These buses have done an invaluable job in demonstrating to the public that fuel cells are no different to internal combustion engines in performance and safety. However the buses themselves are grossly inefficient in commercial terms, costing, as they do, some five times as much as a similar diesel bus and requiring 250 kilowatts fuel cell to operate them. The next logical step in commercialising the operation of fuel cell powered public transport vehicles must therefore be to integrate the fuel cell into an energy efficient tram.

The full report can be found by following this Link.

Popularity: 15% [?]

 

 Interesting item claims scientists have developed ”affordable”, rapid-charge / discharge modified lithium-ion batteries. This improvement might make a significant difference to the prospects for practical EVs / PHEVs, by extension to G2V for smoothing wind energy outputs.

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7938001.stm

Popularity: 6% [?]

Claverton Hydrogen Storage on IGCC Sites

 

Dear Neil

 

You asked if it would be practical to store syngas as a method of allowing IGCC-CCS plants to respond to the overnight fall in demand

 

The prospects of the on-site storage of syngas, to enable an IGCC to vary its output seem limited. The gas that would have to be stored would have to be hydrogen. Otherwise, the processes by which the carbon in the syngas is removed would have continuously vary their throughput. Only the gasifier and air separation unit ( for supply of oxygen) would run at a constant output

 

Unfortunately, a very large amount of gas is produced when gasifying coal. It does not matter whether it is raw gas, purified syngas, or hydrogen. For a plant producing 350 MW of electricity, this would require the storage of about 180 thousand cubic metres of hydrogen an hour.

 

By pressurising the hydrogen to 100 bar, this results in the need for 1800 cubic metres of space. The cheapest way of doing this would be in a 42 inch pipeline, which would need to be two kilometres long.

 

Problem solved?  I don’t think so:

 

1. The most obvious issue is that this is just one hour’s output from a medium sized plant. To deal with the overnight situation, while demand falls, one would need 5-8 hours storage, so the pipeline would have to be 10-15km long

 

2. This calculation assumes that all of the hydrogen can be removed from the pipe. In practice the pressure in the pipe would only be allowed to fall to 50 bar. There are several reasons for this restriction. These include:

 

  • Avoiding the need to compress the hydrogen, once it falls below the required gas turbine burner pressure.

 

  • Minimising fatigue of the pipeline

 

  • Minimising temperature changes in the pipeline because of withdrawal of hydrogen    

     

3. There are questions about embrittlement effects on the high strength steels that are needed for 100bar pipelines. I cannot get a clear answer on this.

 

This fact doubles the length of the pipeline to 20-30 km for just one night’s storage.

 

Other points:

 

Natural gas was stored in large diameter bullets, but this seems to have been less popular than storing the gas in a liquefied form. Furthermore, because of the low calorific value of hydrogen, hydrogen bullets would have to be three times bigger.

 

Hydrogen storage in pipelines becomes practical once there is a large network of high pressure pipelines. This is what I have been saying for several years. As there is no prospect of this being built in the near future, my SNG option is probably the most practical solution, if we are going for an IGCC type process.

 

Dr Fred Starr FIMMM, C.Eng

 

18th Feb 2009

 

 

Popularity: 10% [?]