<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Claverton Group &#187; Nuclear energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/tag/nuclear-energy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com</link>
	<description>Elite Energy, Environment &#38; Tranporation Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is nuclear power flexible, does it have load following capability?</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/is-nuclear-power-flexible-does-it-have-load-following-capability.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/is-nuclear-power-flexible-does-it-have-load-following-capability.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 11:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grid control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid/blackouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermittent power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Notes on the Flexibility of Nuclear Units  What is “Flexibility”?  What does “flexibility” mean for a generating technology?  I guess that most people would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/is-nuclear-power-flexible-does-it-have-load-following-capability.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Load following / flexibility of nuclear power generation</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/load-following-flexibility-of-nuclear-power-generation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/load-following-flexibility-of-nuclear-power-generation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grid control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter You have not looked hard enough for the data, so what you said about nuclear units is misleading. For example: Most French and Belgian nuclear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/load-following-flexibility-of-nuclear-power-generation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear power  output is flexible and therefore capable of load following</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/nuclear-power-is-flexible-in-its-output.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/nuclear-power-is-flexible-in-its-output.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electricity/Power Grids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Here is the quote : “The most recent nuclear plant in France (Flamanville 3, in Lower Normandy, EPR standard design currently under construction) will have considerable response capability - being able to maintain its output at 25% and then ramp up to full output at a rate of 2.5% of rated power per minute up to 60% output and then at 5% of rated output per minute up to full rated power. This means that the unit can change its output from 25% to 100% of full rated output in less than 30 minutes.” (entirely personal, entirely subjective comment : that does sound pretty fast to me)

-          a stated limitation is if you want to take it right down to 25% of output, you should do that no more than twice a day.

 It is also recommended in order to ensure the most economic use of the nuclear fuel and to minimise outage durations (which are really, really short – like, a fortnight every 500 days), not to go down to 25% of nameplate, having gone to full power in between, more than a hundred times a year – but that latter annual recommended limit is not an absolute physical limitation (so that no bits of metal will collide and go “bang” if you cycle to such a low, more often).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/nuclear-power-is-flexible-in-its-output.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How quickly can nuclear and wind generation be built, and how expensive / cheap is it compared to wind energy?</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/how-quickly-can-nuclear-and-wind-generation-be-built-and-how-expensive-cheap-is-it-compared-to-wind-energy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/how-quickly-can-nuclear-and-wind-generation-be-built-and-how-expensive-cheap-is-it-compared-to-wind-energy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hugh Sharman wrote:

>> Nuclear may be cheap to run; I have no expertise in that area.  But
>>  it is brutally expensive and slow to build.


Paul M wrote:

> £1270 a kilowatt according to MIT and £6/MWh to run


The main problem there being that you can't contract MIT to build a
nuclear plant for you at that price.  If you ask the people who *can*
build you a plant, they'll give you a build price quite a lot higher
than that.  As Florida Power &#038; Light (ca. £4000/kW), and Canada
(£5000+/kW) have recently found out.  And nuclear build costs continue
to escalate: when countries start competing for limited supply capacity,
and industry bottlenecks squeeze tighter, costs will rise further.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/how-quickly-can-nuclear-and-wind-generation-be-built-and-how-expensive-cheap-is-it-compared-to-wind-energy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professor David Elliot, Open University criticises New Labour Policy On Nuclear Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/professor-david-elliot-open-university-criticises-new-labour-policy-on-energy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/professor-david-elliot-open-university-criticises-new-labour-policy-on-energy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuclear expansion? Not in my name The public debate and the government consultations in 2006 and 2007 on nuclear power were framed in the context [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/professor-david-elliot-open-university-criticises-new-labour-policy-on-energy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

