<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Claverton Group &#187; intermittency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/tag/intermittency/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com</link>
	<description>Elite Energy, Environment &#38; Tranporation Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The costs of variability due to the presence of large quantities of intermittent/variable wind energy on the UK national grid.</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/the-costs-of-variability-due-to-the-presence-of-large-quantities-of-intermittentvariable-wind-energy-on-the-uk-national-grid.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/the-costs-of-variability-due-to-the-presence-of-large-quantities-of-intermittentvariable-wind-energy-on-the-uk-national-grid.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demand manage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity/Power Grids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid/blackouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermittent power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermittency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind enegy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Managing Variability &#8211; A report to WWF-UK, RSPB, Greenpeace UK and Friends of the Earth EWNI SUMMARY In order to comply with legislation from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/the-costs-of-variability-due-to-the-presence-of-large-quantities-of-intermittentvariable-wind-energy-on-the-uk-national-grid.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Grid&#8217;s views on 36% wind in UK power generation mix</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/national-grids-views-on-36-wind-in-generation-mix.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/national-grids-views-on-36-wind-in-generation-mix.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Supergrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interconnectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermittency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk national grid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear all,   Regarding the concerns expressed in this dialogue (on the claverton mailing list &#8211; ed) regarding the intermittency of wind and the risk [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/national-grids-views-on-36-wind-in-generation-mix.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are nuclear energy and wind energy fundamentally incompatible in large penetrations due to the intermittency of one and the inflexibility of the other?</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/3283.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/3283.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incompatible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflexibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermittency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear P I made a mistake,&#8230;.. it was EDF and E.ON who made the submission. Not E.ON and National Power (who are now owned by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/3283.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A very significant admission by the US FERC chairman that the issue of integrating variable sources of power is not such a big issue</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/a-very-significant-admission-by-the-us-ferc-chairman-that-the-issue-of-integrating-variable-sources-of-power-is-not-such-a-big-issue.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/a-very-significant-admission-by-the-us-ferc-chairman-that-the-issue-of-integrating-variable-sources-of-power-is-not-such-a-big-issue.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demand manage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Supergrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid/blackouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interconnectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hvdc supergrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intercons./hvdc/etc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermittency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind Power and Reliability: The Roles of Baseload and Variable Resources Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Chairman Jon Wellinghoff has stated that &#8220;baseload capacity is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/a-very-significant-admission-by-the-us-ferc-chairman-that-the-issue-of-integrating-variable-sources-of-power-is-not-such-a-big-issue.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Wind Power Reliable? Capacity Credit of Wind Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/is-wind-power-reliable.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/is-wind-power-reliable.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denis Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demand manage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Supergrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interconnectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trustcomment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermittency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Wind Power Reliable   The following is a commentary on David Milborrow&#8217;s article in &#8220;New Power UK/Issue 1/February 2009&#8243;.   As David says, you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/is-wind-power-reliable.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

