Owning and Operating Costs of Waste and Biomass Power Plants
ByClaverton Energy Conference, 23/24/25th October 2009
Dave Andrews, DAEC
(Note - this is a general note about one manufacturer. For a a more detailed and recent survey of suitable manufactuers, send an email to tyningroad@gmail.com)
Here are some broad brush head line figures for the owning and operating of a particular kind of advanced staged combustion power plant, obtained from a leading manufacturer, suitable for biomass, waste materials and waste wood. The process is essential combustion, but is referred to as gasification / combustion, meaning the material is first charred on a grate, with the off syngas being burnt in a separate adjacent and low level refractory chamber. The char is then burnt at a later stage as it moves down the great. This leads to greater burn up of fuel and lower emissions. The syngas combustion is maintained within the ceramic, and special gas flows prevent the contaminants in the gases fouling and degrading the ceramics.
This is a big issue in conventional plants since refractories have to be replaced every few years due to chlorine attack.
Bankability
Since 3 of these plants have now been built, with extensive operating cost, they are fully bankable. Indeed the vendor will build, finance, own and operate units if clients desire.
Modularity
These plants are modular in nature so any size up to 80 MW can be constructed from 4 basic sizes – this keeps costs down.
Build Costs (all high budget figures) for a 4.5 MWe plant
Civil build including all utility connections grid gas water and drains small power and lighting site completed 3-4 million pounds.
Power plant with gross output of circa 4.5 MWe will cost in the region of 12-13 Million depending on final design and spec and commodity costs at the time of order.
So turn key installation could cost 15-17 Million pounds.
Cost of capital
If we amortise 17 million over a period of 15 years the cost would be for money paid back on a 7% rate of interest on a yearly basis is £2.32 million to pay back per year.
Staffing levels
Six members of staff, in total, will be needed to operate the plant at a yearly cost of £200,000 and all these staff will be able to service the unit basic maintenance needs with specialist help brought in from time to time.
Spares and other consumables
For all the spare parts needed and the dosing agents required and all other requirements in costs to run a power plant use a high budget of £500,000 per year.
Total running costs
This will then gives a total running and purchasing cost figure of £3.02 million pounds per year.
The net output will be around 4 MWe depending on final specifications.
Revenue
This will produce £4,807,269 of revenue per year under new feed in tariff or FIT.
Fuel cost and return
The fuel needed for 30% wet waste wood paper and card will be 5-6 tones per hour or 45,000 tones per year. If we presume this to be zero gain zero cost, assume no gate fee then this makes a very robust safety margin, ie income over costs, for the future.
Ie a net profit of £1,787,269 as a likely worse case scenario.
Joint Ventures, Build Own Operate, etc
The manufacturers are interested in owning plants either partly or fully as a project partner if this is of interest to the client. The above type of plant will be performance bonded to give absolute surety’s to maximum continuous ratings.
General performance and costs figures
Virgin wood generally are cheaper to build and have higher efficiencies than plant burning waste or contaminated wood.
The following budget figures are reasonable:
Fuel |
Waste wood, reclaimed contaminated wood, card etc |
Forest wood |
||||
Power Output |
2 MW |
20 MW(2 x 10 MW) |
80 MW(4 x 20 MW) |
2 MW |
20 MW(2 x 10MW) |
80 MW(4 x 20 MW) |
£/MW |
4000 | 3500 | 3000 | 3500 | 3000 | 2500 |
Efficiency % |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 25 | 27 |
Note – the above figures are provisional – but near enough – they will be finalised in the next two weeks. DA – 31 October 2009 (This is a draft paper)
Waste Compliance Directive – WID
All waste combustion plants must meet the Waste Compliance Directive – typically the plants concerned are half WID limits.
Heights of buildings
Typical most conventional stage combustion plants tend to have very tall buildings, due to the need for long residence times demanded by WID, and chimneys for dispersion. Advanced combustion techniques as used here, by virtue of existing horizontally, rather than upwards, can be restricted to 14m in height, which is a significant advantage for planning permission.
Fuels – ability to deal with a wide range of fuel types and contaminants.
These kind of plants can deal with anything from virgin wood to highly contaminated waste wood, ie containing plastics and metals, up to 30 % moisture content, and even 40% aggregate / brick. Partly this is due to the ability to recycle hot air, but other advanced techniques are employe.
Further info: dave dot andrews the at symbol gmail dot com
Popularity: 19% [?]

We would do this project for half the capital cost. When would you like to begin?
Neal Van Milligen
Bioten Power and Energy Group
cavm@aol.com
270-275-9164
From the Tabular statistics above, one would assume, that the waste wood processes are less efficient then the forestwood processes.
An interesting parameter to include in the above would be a comparison of conventional fuel (like coal) $/MW on production site v/s $/MW on the consumer side.
A less friendly figure on the consumer side in $/MW terms using conventional fuel,compared to the $/MW figure on the production side(and its relative comparison with above),should act as a pointer towards non-captive power planing.
Am I making sense ?
V
Adding costs of 1 MWh produced by these power stations compared with the cost of electricity produced by power stations using conventional fuel to the above table of the budget figures would be very productive for better understanding the situation around sustainable energy.
Sir,
I am the Solid Waste Manager for our Utility in a US Territoryxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. The Utility is Ameican xxxxxxxxxxxxxxPower Authority. I am interested in the WtE technology and would like to learn more on your BioMass technology.
I’m also interested in a combination of Biomass & Municipal wastes technology if you have.
Kindly advise on your convenience,
Regards,
Petero xxxxxxx