Nuclear power output is flexible and therefore capable of load following

PM notes:

Statistics which to my mind appear to prove EPRs have fair flexibility which I sent to a nuclear-flexibility-sceptic :

Quote from attached July 2008 paper for the government by Sinclair : ONLY RELATES TO NEW NUCLEAR (PWRs; this specific data is being cited for EPRs) – not old graphite-cored UK reactors :

NB Paper reference is BERR Publication URN 08/1021 and it was from the former BERR government department :
Here’s the link, to the 3MB pdf:
http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46772.pdf

Here is the quote : “The most recent nuclear plant in France (Flamanville 3, in Lower Normandy, EPR standard design currently under construction) will have considerable response capability – being able to maintain its output at 25% and then ramp up to full output at a rate of 2.5% of rated power per minute up to 60% output and then at 5% of rated output per minute up to full rated power. This means that the unit can change its output from 25% to 100% of full rated output in less than 30 minutes.” (entirely personal, entirely subjective comment : that does sound pretty fast to me)

-          a stated limitation is if you want to take it right down to 25% of output, you should do that no more than twice a day.

It is also recommended in order to ensure the most economic use of the nuclear fuel and to minimise outage durations (which are really, really short – like, a fortnight every 500 days), not to go down to 25% of nameplate, having gone to full power in between, more than a hundred times a year – but that latter annual recommended limit is not an absolute physical limitation (so that no bits of metal will collide and go “bang” if you cycle to such a low, more often).

There are of course some limitations on the flexibility of ANY plant, even a limit on number of recommended starts per year of an OCGT. …. nothing is INFINITELY flexible.   Not even Darcy Bussell.

Related Posts

MPs request National Audit Office investigation into nuclear deal

Is nuclear power flexible, does it have load following capability?

Load following / flexibility of nuclear power generation

Nuclear Unanswered Questions

1 Comment

  1. Daya Nuklir | Anxderita’s Weblog - December 28, 2011, 2:03 pm Reply

    [...] (2009-10-13). “Nuclear Power Is Flexible – Claverton Energy Group”. Claverton-energy.com. Diakses pada 24 Agustus [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

freeway-cuirie