<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Claverton Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com</link>
	<description>an association of energy, environmental and transportation agencies and companies,  as well as journalists, academics, politicians and policy makers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Claverton Combined Heat and Power Energy Conferences</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/4496.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/4496.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity/Power Grids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piped/District heat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHP / RENEWABLE / POWER ROAD SHOWS &#38;  CONFERENCES 2013 With many conferences, the more you pay, the more, higher paid industry executives you get from &#8220;Big Energy&#8221; spouting what is essentially self-serving propaganda. These Claverton / GMP conferences will have by contrast incisive discussions of the real energy issues facing us, taking apart the dramatic failure of years of UK Energy Policy which has been largely constructed to meet the lobbying and interests of &#8220;Big Energy&#8221; whose business model is to sell  more, not less energy. You will also get technical experts to give you insider views of various cutting edge energy technologies. Organized by GMP Publishing who publish a range of international energy related magazines 20th &#8211; 21st March 2013 at Event City, Manchester 30th May &#8211; Prince Phillip Centre, London 25th &#8211; 26th September &#8211; University of West England, Bristol &#160; Don’t miss the chance to speak!  – join the industry leaders and sector experts who have signed up for the event from local authorities, engineering companies, technical advisors, government, planning consultancies, project developers, investors and many others. And with more speakers across the day and with specific exhibitors booked in, this event will be highly targeted to the CHP / Renewables &#38; Independent markets. Don’t miss this opportunity to bring back the benefits of latest information and invaluable networking to your organisation. Register below. Download speaker / subject list Download speakers biographies Conference flyer &#160; Note: Could all participants put their professional details on the professional register on this site. Also, to join the Claverton Yahoo Energy Discussion group – send an email to herb@hetranslation.co.uk, moderator. If you would like to join in on line discussions please provide your email &#8211; we will not use this for any other purpose, other than to invite you to an online forum.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a href="http://www.gmp.uk.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=517" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">CHP / RENEWABLE / POWER ROAD SHOWS &amp;  CONFERENCES 2013</a></h2>
<p>With many conferences, the more you pay, the more, higher paid industry executives you get from &#8220;Big Energy&#8221; spouting what is essentially self-serving propaganda. These Claverton / GMP conferences will have by contrast incisive discussions of the real energy issues facing us, taking apart the dramatic failure of years of UK Energy Policy which has been largely constructed to meet the lobbying and interests of &#8220;Big Energy&#8221; whose business model is to sell  more, not less energy. You will also get technical experts to give you insider views of various cutting edge energy technologies.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Organized by GMP Publishing who publish a range of international energy related magazines</p>
<p>20th &#8211; 21st March 2013 at Event City, Manchester<br />
30th May &#8211; Prince Phillip Centre, London<br />
25th &#8211; 26th September &#8211; University of West England, Bristol</p>
<p><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/trucking1.png" class="local-link"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4566" alt="trucking" src="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/trucking1.png" width="600" height="120" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Don’t miss the chance to speak! </strong> – join the industry leaders and sector experts who have signed up for the event from local authorities, engineering companies, technical advisors, government, planning consultancies, project developers, investors and many others.</p>
<p>And with more <a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Roadshow-Speakers-1-21.pdf" class="local-link">speakers</a> across the day and with specific exhibitors booked in, this event will be highly targeted to the CHP / Renewables &amp; Independent markets.</p>
<p>Don’t miss this opportunity to bring back the benefits of latest information and invaluable networking to your organisation. Register below.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Roadshow-Speakers-1-21.pdf" class="local-link">Download speaker / subject list</a></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/speakers-at-conference-30th-jan1.docx" class="local-link">Download speakers biographies</a></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"><strong><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Website-6-weeks-to-go1.pdf" class="local-link">Conference flyer</a></strong><b></b></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
[contact-form-7]
<p><b><i>Note</i></b><i>: Could all participants put their professional details on the professional register on this site. Also, to join the Claverton Yahoo Energy Discussion group – send an email to <a href="mailto:Herb@hetranslation.co.uk">herb@hetranslation.co.uk</a>, moderator.</i></p>
<p>If you would like to join in on line discussions please provide your email &#8211; we will not use this for any other purpose, other than to invite you to an online forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/4496.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disgracefully innaccurate and incompetent report on Channel 4, global warming, renewables</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/disgracefully-innaccurate-and-incompetent-report-on-channel-4-global-warming-renewables.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/disgracefully-innaccurate-and-incompetent-report-on-channel-4-global-warming-renewables.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Channel 4 News I have enjoyed Channel 4 News over the years, but was so shocked at the poor quality of your item on climate change and renewables earlier this week I decided to offer some feedback. Your weather balloon stunt was mildly entertaining and showed pretty pictures of clouds, but what was the point exactly? Cathy Newman began her interview by claiming: &#8216;The extreme rise in temperatures many of you predicted hasn&#8217;t happened&#8217;-  Prof Nigel Arnell was clearly nervous and did not make a good case. FACTS &#8211; No-one has predicted an extreme rise in temperature. What has been predicted is an apparently small but steady rise in global temperature, believed to be due to human activity, which if not addressed will have extreme effects on our climate. The real time monitoring data showing this steady rise is easily available, and the broad worldwide consensus among climate scientists makes their argument compelling.  Anomolies and extremes, such as the recent cold weather in UK, have been widely predicted by climate scientists and will continue; to suggest that our recent cold winter indicates that &#8216;Global Warming&#8217; is not true is fatuously simplistic. Cathy Newman said &#8216;Green Subsidies will cost us a fortune&#8217; FACTS &#8211; Total paid out for renewable energy feed-in-tariffs in UK during financial year 2011-2012 according to Ofgem was £150million (http://bit.ly/12SLQkz). This support for developing technology has been very effective in unit cost reduction (See example in attached graph PVPriceVol.jpg). Bjorn Lomberg said nothing of consequence in his usual charismatic way on this. Compare this level of subsidy to those given to established nuclear and fossil fuel based technologies. &#8216;The C&#38;AG&#8217;s report on the 2010-11 WGA shows the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority&#8217;s estimated cost of civil nuclear decommissioning increased by around £16 billion to £53 billion between 2007 and 2011.&#8217; from Public Accounts Committee report on nuclear legacy costs. Margaret Hodge spoke about this on the Today programme recently. A figure of £50 billion represents around 4% of GDP. This taxpayer subsidy for nuclear energy will be funded by taxpayers, as will the £150 billion over 30 years to French state owned EDF if Hinckley C goes ahead. Annual worldwide subsidies for fossil fuels are estimated to amount to around $1 trillion. A good summary of relative levels of subsidies, based on credible data from the International Energy Agency, appeared in the Guardian last year - http://bit.ly/Ayitoj. Green subsidies will not cost us a fortune, are much better value than other energy subsidies, and will help mitigate the effects of climate change if they are allowed to develop. An internet search on &#8216;green subsidies&#8217; produces links to lots of ideological rants. They are just that and have a very tenuous link to reality. The insinuation that windpower and/or PV (solar panels) are ineffective and a waste of money has no basis in fact &#8211; actual data on the increasing proportion of our electricity generated from renewables, and rising commercial investment in them, is easily available if you look. Link to some pertinent DECC stats: Key points: https://restats.decc.gov.uk/cms/national-renewables-statistics/#key The growth of electricity generation by renewables: https://restats.decc.gov.uk/cms/electricity-growth/ The growth in installed capacity: https://restats.decc.gov.uk/cms/electrical-capacity-1/ A short video on recent global warming trends: http://bit.ly/16UHaej Channel 4 news should consider whether to listen to the careful, detailed, credible work of hundreds of trained professionals, or go populist and reflect the widespread ranting of ideologs, climate change deniers and vested interests. Please take your responsibility as a public broadcaster a little more seriously and do a &#8216;factcheck&#8217; on climate change and renewable energy. &#8211; Martin Otto www.lockinenergy.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Channel 4 News<br />
I have enjoyed Channel 4 News over the years, but was so shocked at the<br />
poor quality of your item on climate change and renewables earlier this<br />
week I decided to offer some feedback.<br />
Your weather balloon stunt was mildly entertaining and showed pretty<br />
pictures of clouds, but what was the point exactly?<br />
Cathy Newman began her interview by claiming:<br />
&#8216;The extreme rise in temperatures many of you predicted hasn&#8217;t<br />
happened&#8217;-  Prof Nigel Arnell was clearly nervous and did not make a<br />
good case.<br />
FACTS &#8211; No-one has predicted an extreme rise in temperature. What has<br />
been predicted is an apparently small but steady rise in global<br />
temperature, believed to be due to human activity, which if not<br />
addressed will have extreme effects on our climate. The real time<br />
monitoring data showing this steady rise is easily available, and the<br />
broad worldwide consensus among climate scientists makes their argument<br />
compelling.  Anomolies and extremes, such as the recent cold weather in<br />
UK, have been widely predicted by climate scientists and will continue;<br />
to suggest that our recent cold winter indicates that &#8216;Global Warming&#8217;<br />
is not true is fatuously simplistic.<br />
Cathy Newman said<br />
&#8216;Green Subsidies will cost us a fortune&#8217;<br />
FACTS &#8211; Total paid out for renewable energy feed-in-tariffs in UK during<br />
financial year 2011-2012 according to Ofgem was £150million<br />
(<a href="http://bit.ly/12SLQkz" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">http://bit.ly/12SLQkz</a>). This support for developing technology has been<br />
very effective in unit cost reduction (See example in attached graph<br />
PVPriceVol.jpg). Bjorn Lomberg said nothing of consequence in his usual<br />
charismatic way on this.<br />
Compare this level of subsidy to those given to established nuclear and<br />
fossil fuel based technologies.<br />
&#8216;The C&amp;AG&#8217;s report on the 2010-11 WGA shows the Nuclear<br />
Decommissioning Authority&#8217;s estimated cost of civil nuclear<br />
decommissioning increased by around £16 billion to £53 billion between<br />
2007 and 2011.&#8217; from Public Accounts Committee report on nuclear legacy<br />
costs. Margaret Hodge spoke about this on the Today programme recently.<br />
A figure of £50 billion represents around 4% of GDP. This taxpayer<br />
subsidy for nuclear energy will be funded by taxpayers, as will the £150<br />
billion over 30 years to French state owned EDF if Hinckley C goes<br />
ahead. Annual worldwide subsidies for fossil fuels are estimated to<br />
amount to around $1 trillion. A good summary of relative levels of<br />
subsidies, based on credible data from the International Energy Agency,<br />
appeared in the Guardian last year - <a href="http://bit.ly/Ayitoj" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">http://bit.ly/Ayitoj</a>. Green<br />
subsidies will not cost us a fortune, are much better value than other<br />
energy subsidies, and will help mitigate the effects of climate change<br />
if they are allowed to develop.<br />
An internet search on &#8216;green subsidies&#8217; produces links to lots of<br />
ideological rants. They are just that and have a very tenuous link to<br />
reality.<br />
The insinuation that windpower and/or PV (solar panels) are ineffective<br />
and a waste of money has no basis in fact &#8211; actual data on the<br />
increasing proportion of our electricity generated from renewables, and<br />
rising commercial investment in them, is easily available if you look.<br />
Link to some pertinent DECC stats:<br />
Key points:<br />
<a href="https://restats.decc.gov.uk/cms/national-renewables-statistics/#key" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">https://restats.decc.gov.uk/<wbr />cms/national-renewables-<wbr />statistics/#key</a><br />
The growth of electricity generation by renewables:<br />
<a href="https://restats.decc.gov.uk/cms/electricity-growth/" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">https://restats.decc.gov.uk/<wbr />cms/electricity-growth/</a><br />
The growth in installed capacity:<br />
<a href="https://restats.decc.gov.uk/cms/electrical-capacity-1/" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">https://restats.decc.gov.uk/<wbr />cms/electrical-capacity-1/</a><br />
A short video on recent global warming trends:<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/16UHaej" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">http://bit.ly/16UHaej</a><br />
Channel 4 news should consider whether to listen to the careful,<br />
detailed, credible work of hundreds of trained professionals, or go<br />
populist and reflect the widespread ranting of ideologs, climate change<br />
deniers and vested interests. Please take your responsibility as a<br />
public broadcaster a little more seriously and do a &#8216;factcheck&#8217; on<br />
climate change and renewable energy.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
Martin Otto</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lockinenergy.co.uk/" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">www.lockinenergy.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/disgracefully-innaccurate-and-incompetent-report-on-channel-4-global-warming-renewables.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;District energy: Today and the Future Potential&#8221; presentation</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/district-energy-today-and-the-future-potential-presentation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/district-energy-today-and-the-future-potential-presentation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[District energy: Today and the Future Potential &#8211; Peter Hamnett &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/GMP-Conference-Presentation-UKDEA-210313.pdf" class="local-link">District energy: Today and the Future Potential &#8211; Peter Hamnett</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/district-energy-today-and-the-future-potential-presentation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All &#8220;Sources&#8221; of  Energy are Not  Equal &#8211; presentation</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/all-sources-of-energy-are-not-equal-presentation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/all-sources-of-energy-are-not-equal-presentation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All &#8220;Sources&#8221; of  Energy are Not  Equal:   The Role of Negawatts &#8211; David Olivier]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Pres-for-CHP-and-Renewables-Roadshow-210312.pdf" class="local-link">All &#8220;Sources&#8221; of  Energy are Not  Equal:   The Role of Negawatts &#8211; David Olivier</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/all-sources-of-energy-are-not-equal-presentation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Compliance &#8211; An Overhead or an Opportunity?</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/energy-compliance-an-overhead-or-an-opportunity.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/energy-compliance-an-overhead-or-an-opportunity.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A presentation by Darren Jones B.Sc.(Hons) Eng. Tech MCIBSE LCEA - Managing Director of Low Carbon Europe. Available to download here: Energy Compliance “An Overhead or an Opportunity?” 21st March 2013 City Exhibition Centre, Manchester]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A presentation by Darren Jones B.Sc.(Hons) Eng. Tech MCIBSE LCEA - <em id="__mceDel">Managing Director of Low Carbon Europe. </em></p>
<p><em id="__mceDel">Available to download here:</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Manchester-Presentation-Darren-Jones.pdf" class="local-link"><strong>Energy Compliance </strong></a><br />
<a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Manchester-Presentation-Darren-Jones.pdf" class="local-link"> <strong>“An Overhead or an Opportunity?”</strong></a><br />
<a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Manchester-Presentation-Darren-Jones.pdf" class="local-link"> 21st March 2013</a><br />
<a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Manchester-Presentation-Darren-Jones.pdf" class="local-link"> City Exhibition Centre, Manchester</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/energy-compliance-an-overhead-or-an-opportunity.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs request National Audit Office investigation into nuclear deal</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/mps-request-national-audit-office-investigation-into-nuclear-deal.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/mps-request-national-audit-office-investigation-into-nuclear-deal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Whitehead MP, Simon Hughes MP, Caroline Lucas MP, Zac Goldsmith MP House of Commons Westminster 27 March 2013 Amyas Morse Comptroller and Auditor General Energy, Climate Change, and Sustainability National Audit Office London SW1W 9SP &#160; Dear Amyas &#160; Set in the context of the proposed UK Energy Bill, ongoing Decc and Treasury negotiations with the French nuclear corporation EdF are key. Through these negotiations, Decc are aiming to guarantee a set price for nuclear energy &#8211; a ‘strike price’. The scale of the proposed ‘Contract for Difference’ (CfD) is potentially very large, and it is understood that the length of the proposed contract may last for a very long time. It is important to note that, because of ‘commercial confidentiality’, there will be very limited public or Parliamentary access to information about key details of these non-reviewable contracts. For such key negotiations, with such important outcomes (potentially locking in UK taxpayers and energy consumers to a 35-40 year contract), there are concerns that these talks may lack the necessary democratic accountability, fiscal and regulatory checks and balances. It is also argued that one of the main impacts of this contract may be to shift the economic risk of building new nuclear facilities from the nuclear corporations to the taxpayer and consumer. And these risks may prove very large. Further, it is possible that these negotiations will be subject to EC Competition Directorate inquiry as to whether the outcome of these negotiations may prove to be in contravention to EU state aid legislation. Therefore, in the context of openness, transparency, fiscal and regulatory accountability, and ‘best value’ for the UK taxpayer and energy consumer &#8211; it seems reasonable to suggest that these negotiations should be subject to an in-depth and timely review. We understand that the NAO cannot investigate issues that Parliament has passed judgement on. However these negotiations are currently ongoing, and Decc plans to present their outcomes to Parliament before the relevant legislation has been passed. In this sense, the issue seems clearly to fall within the remit of the NAO. We therefore join together in requesting the National Audit Office to &#8211; at the soonest possible opportunity &#8211; engage in a detailed review of the form, function and potential outcomes of the negotiations between Treasury/Decc and EdF. Please regard this letter as an initial preparatory approach. We, and our Parliamentary and expert advisors would welcome a meeting with you in order to discuss this matter in much greater detail. &#160; Yours Sincerely Alan Whitehead MP, Member of the Commons Select Committees on Energy and Climate Change and Environmental Audit, Chair of PRASEG (Associate Parliamentary Renewable and Sustainable Energy Group) and Co-Chair of APSRG (Associate Parliamentary Sustainable Resource Group). &#160; Simon Hughes MP, Deputy leader of the Liberal Democrat Party, former Shadow Secretary of State for the Department of Energy and Climate Change. &#160; Caroline Lucas, Green MP, Member of the Parliamentary Environmental Audit Committee, Co-Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Fuel Poverty, Vice Chair of the Public and Commercial Services, Vice Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Peak Oil and Gas, former Leader of the Green Party. Zac Goldsmith MP, author of The Constant Economy, served as Deputy Chairman to the Conservative Quality of Life Policy Group. &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Whitehead MP, Simon Hughes MP, Caroline Lucas MP, Zac Goldsmith MP</p>
<p>House of Commons<br />
Westminster<br />
27 March 2013<br />
Amyas Morse<br />
Comptroller and Auditor General<br />
Energy, Climate Change, and Sustainability<br />
National Audit Office<br />
London SW1W 9SP</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
Dear Amyas</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Set in the context of the proposed UK Energy Bill, ongoing Decc and Treasury negotiations with the French nuclear corporation EdF are key.</p>
<p>Through these negotiations, Decc are aiming to guarantee a set price for nuclear energy &#8211; a ‘strike price’. The scale of the proposed ‘Contract for Difference’ (CfD) is potentially very large, and it is understood that the length of the proposed contract may last for a very long time.</p>
<p>It is important to note that, because of ‘commercial confidentiality’, there will be very limited public or Parliamentary access to information about key details of these non-reviewable contracts.</p>
<p>For such key negotiations, with such important outcomes (potentially locking in UK taxpayers and energy consumers to a 35-40 year contract), there are concerns that these talks may lack the necessary democratic accountability, fiscal and regulatory checks and balances.</p>
<p>It is also argued that one of the main impacts of this contract may be to shift the economic risk of building new nuclear facilities from the nuclear corporations to the taxpayer and consumer. And these risks may prove very large.</p>
<p>Further, it is possible that these negotiations will be subject to EC Competition Directorate inquiry as to whether the outcome of these negotiations may prove to be in contravention to EU state aid legislation.</p>
<p>Therefore, in the context of openness, transparency, fiscal and regulatory accountability, and ‘best value’ for the UK taxpayer and energy consumer &#8211; it seems reasonable to suggest that these negotiations should be subject to an in-depth and timely review.</p>
<p>We understand that the NAO cannot investigate issues that Parliament has passed judgement on. However these negotiations are currently ongoing, and Decc plans to present their outcomes to Parliament before the relevant legislation has been passed. In this sense, the issue seems clearly to fall within the remit of the NAO.</p>
<p>We therefore join together in requesting the National Audit Office to &#8211; at the soonest possible opportunity &#8211; engage in a detailed review of the form, function and potential outcomes of the negotiations between Treasury/Decc and EdF.</p>
<p>Please regard this letter as an initial preparatory approach. We, and our Parliamentary and expert advisors would welcome a meeting with you in order to discuss this matter in much greater detail.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Yours Sincerely</p>
<p>Alan Whitehead MP, Member of the Commons Select Committees on Energy and Climate Change and Environmental Audit, Chair of PRASEG (Associate Parliamentary Renewable and Sustainable Energy Group) and Co-Chair of APSRG (Associate Parliamentary Sustainable Resource Group).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Simon Hughes MP, Deputy leader of the Liberal Democrat Party, former Shadow Secretary of State for the Department of Energy and Climate Change.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Caroline Lucas, Green MP, Member of the Parliamentary Environmental Audit Committee, Co-Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Fuel Poverty, Vice Chair of the Public and Commercial Services, Vice Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Peak Oil and Gas, former Leader of the Green Party.</p>
<p>Zac Goldsmith MP, author of The Constant Economy, served as Deputy Chairman to the Conservative Quality of Life Policy Group.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/mps-request-national-audit-office-investigation-into-nuclear-deal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Too much Green Energy is bad for Britain&#8221; response</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/too-much-green-energy-is-bad-for-britain-response.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/too-much-green-energy-is-bad-for-britain-response.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin Alder&#8216;s response to the Telegraph article &#8211; &#8220;Too much green energy is bad for Britain. In some of the worst weather for more than 30 years, green power still only provides a tiny fraction of our energy needs.&#8221; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/9949595/Too-much-green-energy-is-bad-for-Britain.html Mendacious and dangerous .. in fact, last week if they cared to look wind power was not for the first time helping to save gas with 5+ GW at transmission level and at least half again at distribution. It was very noticeable that gas stations were taking the brunt of the flexing (thus saving gas when there was a shortage) but of course the gas generators would be taking a hit .. there is a concerted effort from the right of politics to push back &#8212; we should recognise it for what it is .. I&#8217;d like to know who is financing the campaign does anyone have an insight?  ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Martin Alder</strong>&#8216;s response to the Telegraph article &#8211; &#8220;Too much green energy is bad for Britain.<br />
In some of the worst weather for more than 30 years, green power still<br />
only provides a tiny fraction of our energy needs.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/9949595/Too-much-green-energy-is-bad-for-Britain.html" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/<wbr />comment/telegraph-view/<wbr />9949595/Too-much-green-energy-<wbr />is-bad-for-Britain.html</a></p>
<p><strong>Mendacious and dangerous .. in fact, last week if they cared to look wind power was not for the first time helping to save gas with 5+ GW at transmission level and at least half again at distribution. It was very noticeable that gas stations were taking the brunt of the flexing (thus saving gas when there was a shortage) but of course the gas generators would be taking a hit .. there is a concerted effort from the right of politics to push back &#8212; we should recognise it for what it is .. I&#8217;d like to know who is financing the campaign does anyone have an insight?</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/too-much-green-energy-is-bad-for-britain-response.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tesla-Westinghouse Systems, Smart Grids and Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/tesla-westinghouse-systems-smart-grids-and-infrastructure.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/tesla-westinghouse-systems-smart-grids-and-infrastructure.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R Hirst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was pleased to present to the British German Environment Forum, and this is the talk I gave. Enjoy. David Smart Grids and Infrastructurev04print &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pleased to present to the British German Environment Forum, and this is the talk I gave. Enjoy.</p>
<p>David</p>
<p><a href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Smart-Grids-and-Infrastructurev04print.pdf" class="local-link">Smart Grids and Infrastructurev04print</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/tesla-westinghouse-systems-smart-grids-and-infrastructure.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;There is no alternative&quot; &#8211; TINA &#8211; this is bxxxxxxxxxxx &#8211; we need to invest in money producing energy infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/there-is-no-alternative-tina-this-is-bxxxxxxxxxxx-we-need-to-invest-in-money-producing-energy-infrastructure.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/there-is-no-alternative-tina-this-is-bxxxxxxxxxxx-we-need-to-invest-in-money-producing-energy-infrastructure.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameron says there is no alternative to austerity&#8230;.This is complete nonsense &#8211; we can borrow money at 3% on international markets  and then invest it in infrastructure which makes 6%, combined heat and power district heating,chpdh being one, then this will make us richer, employ people, take them of the dole and please the markets who will see for once we are doing something sensible, and therefore be willing to lend more money. Obviously they will not want to lend us money to prop people up on the dole and or to buy more telly&#8217;s and cars which we cant afford. Or am I being to simplistic. chris cook via yahoogroups.co.uk 09:42 (4 hours ago) Dave Of course there is an alternative.. The government could simply spend the necessary money (it costs nothing to create) on this infrastructure rather than buying gilts (the completely useless QE) and then get it back and retire it through taxing the production or use of the asset. To do this is of course politically impossible as it would recognise that the existing financial system has robbed us blind for the last 300 years. My approach is to cut out Treasury AND banks as middlemen, and enable direct investment by energy investors in the stream of energy savings through (say) &#8216;Gas Loans&#8217;. I have a major article coming out in the (Glasgow) Sunday Herald either this Sunday or next which covers all this. &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div tabindex="-1">
<div id=":to">
<div id=":wz">
<div id=":w6">Cameron says there is no alternative to austerity&#8230;.This is complete nonsense &#8211; we can borrow money at 3% on international markets  and then invest it in infrastructure which makes 6%, combined heat and power district heating,chpdh being one, then this will make us richer, employ people, take them of the dole and please the markets who will see for once we are doing something sensible, and therefore be willing to lend more money.</p>
<div></div>
<div>Obviously they will not want to lend us money to prop people up on the dole and or to buy more telly&#8217;s and cars which we cant afford.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Or am I being to simplistic.</p>
<div>
<div id=":vz" tabindex="0" role="button" data-tooltip="Show trimmed content"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div tabindex="-1">
<div id=":1ih">
<div>
<table cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div>chris cook <a href="http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&amp;ctx=mail&amp;answer=1311182" target="_blank" class="ext-link" rel="external nofollow" onclick="this.target='_blank';">via</a> yahoogroups.co.uk</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td>
<div>09:42 (4 hours ago)</p>
<div tabindex="-1" role="checkbox"><img alt="" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" /></div>
</div>
</td>
<td></td>
<td rowspan="2">
<div tabindex="0" title="Reply" role="button"><img role="button" alt="" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" /></div>
<div id=":1jl" tabindex="0" title="More" role="button"><img role="menu" alt="" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Dave</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id=":1j5">
<div id=":1j4">
<div dir="ltr">
<div></div>
<div>Of course there is an alternative..</div>
<div></div>
<div>The government could simply spend the necessary money (it costs nothing to create) on this infrastructure rather than buying gilts (the completely useless QE) and then get it back and retire it through taxing the production or use of the asset.</div>
<div></div>
<div>To do this is of course politically impossible as it would recognise that the existing financial system has robbed us blind for the last 300 years.</div>
<div></div>
<div>My approach is to cut out Treasury AND banks as middlemen, and enable direct investment by energy investors in the stream of energy savings through (say) &#8216;Gas Loans&#8217;. I have a major article coming out in the (Glasgow) Sunday Herald either this Sunday or next which covers all this.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/there-is-no-alternative-tina-this-is-bxxxxxxxxxxx-we-need-to-invest-in-money-producing-energy-infrastructure.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>job/vacancy for site engineer in Hull Yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/jobvacancy-for-site-engineer-in-hull-yorkshire.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.claverton-energy.com/jobvacancy-for-site-engineer-in-hull-yorkshire.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Andrews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[jobs/vacancies/roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=4583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A biomass engineering company are urgently looking for an experienced engineer to work on site supervising the final installation and commissioning of a small, 300 kWe wood to electricity, chp, gasifier plant.  This is quite complex, lots of pipes, valves, sensors, automation, wood feeders, ash feeders and so on  etc and they need someone fast and can pay well. You&#8217;ll have to be located near Hull during the week. Job will last about 3 months on site, initially on a contract basis, but  with the potential for permanent employment. Basic French a distinct advantage&#8221; So any electrical / mechanically / electronic / even civil qualified engineers with site experience please contact me asap and I will pass details on tyningroad(the at sympol )gmail.com.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">A biomass engineering company are urgently looking for an experienced engineer to work on site supervising the final installation and commissioning of a small, 300 kWe wood to electricity, chp, gasifier plant.  This is quite complex, lots of pipes, valves, sensors, automation, wood feeders, ash feeders and so on  etc and they need someone fast and can pay well.</span></p>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">You&#8217;ll have to be located near Hull during the week.</span><span style="color: navy; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </span><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Job will last about 3 months on site, initially on a contract basis, but  with the potential for permanent employment.</span><span style="color: navy; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </span><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Basic French a distinct advantage&#8221;</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">So any electrical / mechanically / electronic / even civil qualified engineers with site experience please contact me asap and I will pass details on</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">tyningroad(the at sympol )gmail.com.</span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claverton-energy.com/jobvacancy-for-site-engineer-in-hull-yorkshire.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
