<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article in IET queries role of wind power and balancing costs in the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.claverton-energy.com/article-in-iet-queries-role-of-wind-power-and-balancing-costs-in-the-uk.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/article-in-iet-queries-role-of-wind-power-and-balancing-costs-in-the-uk.html</link>
	<description>Elite Energy, Environment &#38; Tranporation Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.claverton-energy.com/article-in-iet-queries-role-of-wind-power-and-balancing-costs-in-the-uk.html/comment-page-1#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>dave elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claverton-energy.com/?p=3144#comment-786</guid>
		<description>A rather weak effort I thought. No mention of the Earthscan book which looked at all this is detail, or of the UKERC report, which looked at dozens of studies.  The debate ( e.g. in CEG) has in any case moved on- now we are discussing  whether wind or nuclear will have to  be curtailed during low demand periods, if we have large amounts of both on the gird ; and whether a supergird can provide effective balancing across the EU.  Storage may eventually provide part of an answer, but back up using biomass is far easier, as the University of Kassel Combined Power system study suggested. All this gets discussed (ad nauseam!) in Renew-http://eeru.open.ac.uk/renew_online.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rather weak effort I thought. No mention of the Earthscan book which looked at all this is detail, or of the UKERC report, which looked at dozens of studies.  The debate ( e.g. in CEG) has in any case moved on- now we are discussing  whether wind or nuclear will have to  be curtailed during low demand periods, if we have large amounts of both on the gird ; and whether a supergird can provide effective balancing across the EU.  Storage may eventually provide part of an answer, but back up using biomass is far easier, as the University of Kassel Combined Power system study suggested. All this gets discussed (ad nauseam!) in Renew-http://eeru.open.ac.uk/renew_online.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

